Never has this user icon, of Terry Pratchett's Death, been quite so appropriate. As Death says in one of Pratchett's books, "There is no justice. There's just me." That's ironic, since one of the great joys I find in Pratchett's books is that his characters do meet their just rewards.
But today, I am an arbiter of life and death, and money. Louis, my 5.5-year-old guinea pig, has a kidney stone and will die without surgery that will cost $600-900. If it was several thousand dollars, it would be right out, and if it was a couple hundred, I'd do it without hesitation. But he's a middle-aged pig, and I'm not sure I can justify spending a month's rent on him, and frankly I don't even want to have guinea pigs when I graduate. That's a lot of cold reasoning, and I know I'm kind of horrible for it, but I think I've made up my mind to not get the surgery. It's hard to look at him and know that I've sold him out for 1 month's rent, that I have held his little life in my hands and cast it aside, that he would live, but for me.
In general, I believe that if you can't afford to care for your pet, you can't afford to get a pet, and I've been good about taking care of them. But there's obviously a line somewhere, and this surgery is in a terrible gray area, and I think I've chosen the heartless but reasonable option.
Edit: the proper quote is, "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds," from the Bhagavad Gita, brought to me by Oppenheimer's statement at the first nuclear test. In this case, the proper modification is, "I am become Death, destroyer of pigs."
- I am become Death, destroyer of pigs

2008-10-29 05:26 pm (UTC)
2008-10-29 05:42 pm (UTC)
But I'm in an argumentative mood.
2008-10-29 05:52 pm (UTC)
2008-10-30 12:41 am (UTC)
(Anonymous)
2008-10-30 12:36 am (UTC)
However, "that he would live, but for me" is not really true. Piggies in the wild do not have the option of surgery.
-Ruth
2008-10-30 12:44 am (UTC)
The Gita
(Anonymous)
2008-10-30 11:27 am (UTC)
http://www.YogaVidya.com/gita.html
Re: The Gita
2008-10-30 03:34 pm (UTC)
2008-10-30 03:33 pm (UTC)
When I had to make a decision about exploratory surgery for Teya last year, our black cat, I asked the doctor whether what they found out would change anything--whether they would be able to treat what he guessed it would be or not. When he said it probably wouldn't make a difference in treatment or survival, and that if it was what they thought it was, they'd probably euthanize her on the table.
I said, you know, let's just take her home and make her comfortable--and not put her through surgery. Having been through THREE pretty major surgeries in my life, I have to say, if I felt that crummy, I would not want to put an animal through that unless there was a significant quality and quantity of life payoff. You can't explain it to them. You can't ask them what they'd want.
This particular case IS a tough call, but my opinion is that, if you choose to let him go, you wouldn't be a cold hearted person.
watch yourself
(Anonymous)
2008-11-05 12:31 am (UTC)
Re: watch yourself
2008-11-05 12:53 am (UTC)